How to tell whether your works needed consent in the first place — and what to do if they did.
You need retrospective planning permission if you carried out development that legally required consent and you didn't apply for it before starting. The most common triggers are extensions over permitted development limits, outbuildings in the wrong location, fences taller than 2 metres (or 1 metre next to a highway), garage conversions on conditioned estates, and material changes of use. If none of those apply and your works fell within permitted development, you don't need a retrospective application — but a Lawful Development Certificate is the safest way to confirm that in writing.
There are only two questions to answer:
The GPDO 2015 grants automatic permission for many small-scale works on dwellinghouses, subject to size, height and location limits. Common allowances include single-storey rear extensions up to 4m (detached) or 3m (other houses), outbuildings up to 2.5m high near boundaries, and small porches. The full rules are detailed and strict — every limit has exceptions.
Critical caveat: permitted development rights can be removed in five common situations. If any of these apply, you cannot rely on the GPDO and you needed full planning permission:
In our experience, councils discover unauthorised works in five ways: a neighbour complaint (the most common), aerial imagery review, council tax revaluations, sale-of-property searches that flag missing planning history, and routine compliance audits. Once an enforcement officer is on the case, the question moves from "if" to "when", and the strongest position is to get a properly prepared retrospective application in front of them before they issue a formal notice.
The first step is to establish whether the works required permission at all. We provide that at no cost — a written assessment by a Chartered Town Planner of (a) whether the works amounted to development, (b) whether any PDR applied, (c) the likely outcome of a retrospective application, and (d) the realistic alternatives if approval looks unlikely.
Compare the as-built dimensions against the relevant Class A limits in the GPDO 2015. The most common breaches are extensions deeper than 4m (detached) or 3m (other houses), eaves higher than 3m within 2m of a boundary, or single-storey extensions higher than 4m. A Chartered Town Planner can give you a written read in minutes.
The safest answer is no. Once enforcement officers are aware, statutory time limits begin to run and the appeal options narrow. The cheapest and safest route is almost always a properly prepared retrospective application before a formal notice is issued.
No. The council assesses the application as if the work had not been carried out, on its planning merits. The fact that the structure exists is not a basis for approval.
You inherit the planning position with the property. If previous works were unauthorised, you may need to regularise them or apply for a Lawful Development Certificate if they are old enough to be immune from enforcement.
Need an assessment of your case? A Chartered Town Planner will provide a written assessment at no cost. Get a free assessment →
Talk to a Chartered Town Planner today — the first conversation is free.