HomeKnowledge Hub › Can You Get Retrospective Planning Permission?

Can You Get Retrospective Planning Permission?

When you need it, why councils grant it, and the legal framework that controls the answer.

📒 Knowledge Hub article
✅ By a Chartered Town Planner (MRTPI)

Yes, you can get retrospective planning permission. Section 73A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 allows local planning authorities to grant consent for development that has already been built or for a change of use that has already taken place. The council must assess the application as if the work had not yet been carried out — on its planning merits. In our experience, around 70% of these applications are approved, a further 10% are approved with minor modifications, and 20% are refused.

What is retrospective planning permission?

Retrospective planning permission is the formal route for regularising development that has been carried out without the consent it required. It is not a separate kind of permission — it is the same Section 70 / Section 73A application process, with the only difference being the timing. The council looks at exactly the same policies, the same NPPF and the same Local Plan, and applies the same tests. The only advantage to the applicant is that there is no need to model what the finished development might look like, because it already exists.

When do you need it?

Retrospective planning permission is required when development work or a change of use has been carried out without prior approval from your local planning authority (LPA). The starting point is the legal definition of "development" in section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990:

"Development means the carrying out of building, engineering, mining or other operations in, on, over or under land, or the making of any material change in the use of any buildings or other land."

For the purposes of the Act, "building operations" includes demolition, rebuilding, structural alterations or additions to buildings, and other operations normally undertaken by a builder. Material changes of use are not defined in statute and are determined as a matter of fact and degree by the LPA in each case.

What constitutes a "building"

The definition of "building" is not laid down in statute. The courts apply three tests:

  • Degree of permanency — is the structure intended to remain in place?
  • Size — is it of substantial physical scale?
  • Physical attachment — is it fixed to the ground or to another structure?

Works that fall outside the definition of "development" do not need permission at all. These include works to the interior of a building (though listed building consent may still be required) and works that do not materially affect the external appearance of the building.

The three preliminary questions

Before any project, three questions need an answer:

  1. Does the proposal fall within the legal definition of "development"? If no, no permission is needed.
  2. If yes, is it covered by general permitted development rights (the GPDO 2015)?
  3. If no, a specific planning permission is required.

The mistake most homeowners make is stopping after step 2 without checking whether their property has any conditions or Article 4 directions removing the usual permitted development rights. Many newer detached houses, properties in conservation areas, and houses on conditioned estates do not have the freedoms that the GPDO ostensibly grants.

The risks of doing nothing

If you have built without consent and the council finds out, the risks of not engaging are real:

  • Enforcement notice — the council can require you to halt works or undo completed work, with a deadline of typically 28 days to comply.
  • Court action and fines — persistent non-compliance can result in legal proceedings, fines or, in serious cases, forced demolition.
  • Sale and mortgage difficulties — unauthorised development complicates the sale or mortgage of the property. Buyers and lenders routinely require proof of planning compliance.
  • Insurance complications — insurers may decline cover or refuse claims relating to unauthorised structures.

The honest answer

Yes — you can get retrospective planning permission, and most of the time you will. The rules are exactly the same as for a normal application; the difference is that the work is already in front of the case officer when they make their decision. A properly prepared application, framed against the right local plan policies, has a strong chance of success.

Frequently asked questions

Is retrospective planning permission legal?

Yes. Section 73A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 explicitly authorises local planning authorities to grant permission for development that has already been carried out. It is a formal route built into the planning system.

How much does retrospective planning permission cost?

The application fee is the same as for a normal planning application of the equivalent type. Householder applications carry the standard council fee (paid directly by you to the council). RPE charges a fixed fee of £450 + VAT for householder cases and £695 + VAT for everything else.

Can I sell my house with unauthorised development?

It is technically possible but most buyers' solicitors will require either a Lawful Development Certificate (if the works are old enough) or a successful retrospective planning permission before exchange. Mortgage lenders often refuse to lend against unauthorised structures.

What if I just don't apply?

If the development is older than the section 171B time limit, you may already be immune from enforcement and can apply for a Lawful Development Certificate. If it is newer, ignoring the issue invites an Enforcement Notice — and once a notice is in force, the appeal options narrow significantly.

Need an honest read on your case? A Chartered Town Planner will give you a written assessment before you spend a penny. Get a free assessment →

Related reading

Get a Free Assessment Back to Knowledge Hub

Worried about unauthorised works or an enforcement letter?

Talk to a Chartered Town Planner today — the first conversation is free.